Multidisciplinary Collaboration for Socially Assistive Robotics From: AI Magazine - Fall 2008 - Page 98 By: Adriana Tapus The 2007 AAAI Spring Symposium on Multidisciplinary Collaboration for Socially Assistive Robotics brought together researchers in computer science, engineering, sociology, and psychology to discuss this developing research area. Socially assistive robotics focuses on the social, rather than the physical, aspects of interaction between robots and humans in assistive contexts (such as nursing homes, hospitals, rehabilitation, and home environments). Human-robot interaction (HRI) for socially assistive applications is a growing and interdisciplinary field that draws from a range of disciplines in engineering, health sciences, social and cognitive sciences, design, and the arts. Collaboration in this domain requires close coordination and communication between diverse communities of practitioners at all stages of the process: inception, design, development, use, and evaluation. Challenges arise due to disciplinary differences in terminology, methodology, practices, and ethical considerations inherent in multidisciplinary collaboration. This symposium was a first attempt to bring these multiple and diverse research communities together in order to promote interdisciplinary discussion and knowledge transfer. Although this is a young research area, systems are currently being developed for use in hospitals, schools, and homes in therapeutic programs that monitor, encourage, and assist their users. This is an important time in the development of the field, when the broad technical community and the beneficiary populations must work together to guide the intended impact of new technologies to improve human quality of life. The central themes for this symposium were (1) social and physical embeddedness of robots; (2) goal sharing and transfer between robots and humans; (3) nonverbal and verbal methods for establishing and maintaining the user's engagement; (4) factors relevant to the acceptance of assistive robots by a community of users (especially those with special needs); and (5) analytical frameworks and methods that can be applied to building and evaluating socially assistive robots. The symposium featured 12 presentations, 10 posters, two panel presentations, a joint session with the Interaction Challenges for Artificial Assistants Symposium, and much discussion. The presented papers ranged from descriptions of social capabilities needed for robots to assist humans in physical or cognitive tasks (such as rehabilitation and training, therapeutic and educational play, mobility) to social factors and technical designs. The different applications for children with autism, poststroke patients, the elderly, and the visually impaired spanned a variety of technologies and robotic platforms. The presentations identified a number of relevant issues: the role of the robot's physical embodiment; the integration of a priori knowledge about users; ensuring safety in interaction design; the relative roles played by social and physical robot assistance and how they can best be balanced; the representation of a robot's perception and competences in forms accessible and understandable to a non-technical user; and models from psychology, cognitive science, and social science that can be utilized to advance the goals of social assistive robotics. Furthermore, in order to promote and facilitate interdisciplinary communication and discussion, symposium participants took part in two hands-on exercises where they discussed, sketched, and prototyped technologies and scenarios for assistive robots meant for different applications. We considered issues such as intent recognition, modality selection, empathy, adaptive systems, verbal and nonverbal communication, and proactive assistance. Three invited talks were presented at the symposium. Sal Restivo (Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, USA) discussed principles from social theory relevant to the development of socially assistive robots. Brian Scassellati (Yale University, USA) discussed the use of social robots for the diagnosis, treatment, and understanding of autism. Finally, Rachid Alami (LAAS Toulouse, France) described work on service robots that fit in and are accepted by humans in everyday environments. Symposium participants also had the chance to visit two laboratories at Stanford University: Clifford Nass's Communication between Humans and Interactive Media laboratory, which explores the fundamental relationships between humans and interactive media; and Oussama Khatib's robotics laboratory, which focuses on safety in humanrobot interaction with manipulator robotics. Because of the novelty of this research area and high interest by participants, there are plans to continue activities in this field at future AAAI spring symposia and other venues. The papers from this symposium were published in the AAAI technical report series and are available from AAAI Press as AAAI Technical Report SS-07-05.